<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Payame Noor University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Social Cognition</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3782</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Educational Democracy and Its Effects on Students’ Critical Thinking and Social Skills in Middle School</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Educational Democracy and Its Effects on Students’ Critical Thinking and Social Skills in Middle School</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>95</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>108</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">1364</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gholtaj</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor in Curriculum Studies, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdol Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Taheri</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant  Professor in Curriculum Studies, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fatemeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Marahel</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A. student in Education Manegment,  Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2014</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Introduction: The aim of this research was to study and compare the components of educational democracy in non-profit and public schools and its relationship with critical thinking and social skills of students in middle schools of Gachsaran city. Method: The research method was descriptive and comparative. The statistical population included all students and teachers of female guidance schools in 2011-12. There were 75 and 160 teachers in non-profit and public schools, respectively. The second population included female students of guidance schools in 2011-12 who were 320 and 820 in non-profit and public schools, respectively. The method of sampling was randomized clustering. From each type of school 2 were selected randomly. An author-made questionnaire for components of educational democracy whose reliability was confirmed by 5 professors was used. The second questionnaire was Critical Thinking Tendency of Rikth whose reliability was obtained as 0.79 using Cronbach&#039;s Alpha. The third questionnaire was Social Skills Questionnaire of Inderbitsen whose reliability was obtained as 0.86 using Cronbach&#039;s Alpha. The obtained data from questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics (computation of frequency, frequency percentage, cumulative percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and comprehensive statistics (T- test for independent groups). Results: The obtained results suggested that there is a significant difference between public and non-profit schools for components of educational democracy meaning, so that non-profit schools have better status. Also, there was a significant difference between critical thinking and social skills of female students of public and non-profit schools. Conclusions: The scores of non-profit students were better in both cases.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Introduction: The aim of this research was to study and compare the components of educational democracy in non-profit and public schools and its relationship with critical thinking and social skills of students in middle schools of Gachsaran city. Method: The research method was descriptive and comparative. The statistical population included all students and teachers of female guidance schools in 2011-12. There were 75 and 160 teachers in non-profit and public schools, respectively. The second population included female students of guidance schools in 2011-12 who were 320 and 820 in non-profit and public schools, respectively. The method of sampling was randomized clustering. From each type of school 2 were selected randomly. An author-made questionnaire for components of educational democracy whose reliability was confirmed by 5 professors was used. The second questionnaire was Critical Thinking Tendency of Rikth whose reliability was obtained as 0.79 using Cronbach&#039;s Alpha. The third questionnaire was Social Skills Questionnaire of Inderbitsen whose reliability was obtained as 0.86 using Cronbach&#039;s Alpha. The obtained data from questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics (computation of frequency, frequency percentage, cumulative percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and comprehensive statistics (T- test for independent groups). Results: The obtained results suggested that there is a significant difference between public and non-profit schools for components of educational democracy meaning, so that non-profit schools have better status. Also, there was a significant difference between critical thinking and social skills of female students of public and non-profit schools. Conclusions: The scores of non-profit students were better in both cases.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Educational Democracy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Critical thinking</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">social skills</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://sc.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_1364_7f44e74110601203c4f9a718580b553d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
