In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Association of Social Psychology

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of cognitive science, Shahid Beheshti University

2 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Kurdistan University

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Psychology, University of Tehran

Abstract

Introduction: The present study intended to examine the rate of reaction and bias in the perceptual processing associated to paranormal beliefs. Paranormal beliefs are strongly correlated to perceptual biases for detecting illusory patterns, for instance. Perceptual processing and biases are strongly influenced by prior expectations and learning experiences. Methods: A convenient sample of 32 university students (23 male) were recruited for the experiment and were measured by a computerized face/house recognition task and Paranormal Belief Questionnaire (Blackmore & Moore, 1994). Results: The result of ANOVA showed a significant difference between groups with severe and moderain paranormal belief. Therefore, the results showed a significant difference between groups in perceptual-bias and reaction time in relation to paranormal belief. Conclusion: Paranormal beliefs influence the reaction time and perceptual processing.

Keywords

- نرماشیری، ع؛ سهرابی، ا و حاتمی، ج (1396). «سوگیری ادراکی_ شناختی مرتبط با باور فرا­طبیعی: بررسی مقایسه‌ای در گروه‌های برتری جانبی مغزی».نشریه عصب روانشناسی،2(7)،977-90.

- Appelbaum, P. S.; Robbins, P. C. & Roth, L. H. (1999). “Dimensional approach to delusions: comparison across types and diagnoses”. American Journal of Psychiatry156(12), 1938-1943.
- Blackmore, S. & Moore, R. (1994). “Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal”. European Journal of Parapsychology10, 91-103.
- Broad, C. D. (1949). “The relevance of psychical research to philosophy”. Philosophy, 24, 291–309.
Brugger, P. (2001). “From haunted brain to haunted science”. Hauntings and poltergeists: multidisciplinary perspectives. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 175-213.
- Brugger, P. & Taylor, K. I. (2003). “ESP: extrasensory perception or effect of subjective probability?”. Journal of Consciousness Studies10(6-7), 221-246.
- Brugger, P.; Regard, M.; Landis, T.; Cook, N.; Krebs, D. & Niederberger, J. (1993). “Meaningful’patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP”. Psychopathology26(5-6), 261-265. - Brugger, P.; Regard, M.; Landis, T.; Cook, N.; Krebs, D. & Niederberger, J. (1993). “Meaningful’patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP”. Psychopathology26(5-6), 261-265.
- Chadwick, P. D. & Lowe, C. F. (1990). “Measurement and modification of delusional beliefs”. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology58(2), 225.
- Colzato, L. S.; van Beest, I.; van den Wildenberg, W. P.; Scorolli, C.; Dorchin, S.; Meiran, N., ... & Hommel, B. (2010). “God: Do I have your attention?”. Cognition117(1), 87-94.
- Colzato, L. S.; van den Wildenberg, W. P. & Hommel, B. (2008). “Losing the big picture: How religion may control visual attention”. PLoS One3(11), e3679.
- Gianotti, L. R.; Mohr, C.; Pizzagalli, D.; Lehmann, D. & Brugger, P. (2001). “Associative processing and paranormal belief”. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences55(6), 595-603.
- Heekeren, H. R.; Marrett, S.; Bandettini, P. A. & Ungerleider, L. G. (2004). “A general mechanism for perceptual decision-making in the human brain”. Nature431(7010), 859-862.
- Hergovich, A.; Schott, R. & Arendasy, M. (2008). “On the relationship between paranormal belief and schizotypy among adolescents”. Personality and Individual Differences45(2), 119-125.
- Irwin, H. J.The Psychology of Paranormal Belief. University of Hertfordshire Press,2009.
- Jorgensen, P. (1995). “Delusional beliefs: definition and classification”. NordicJournal of Psychiatry, 49, 459–64.
- Leeser, J. & O’Donohue, W. (1999). “What is a delusion? Epistemological dimensions”. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 687–94.
- Lindeman, M. (2017). Paranormal Beliefs. In Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1-4). Springer International Publishing.
- Manschreck, T. C. (1995). “Pathogenesis of delusions”. The Psychiatric clinics of North America18(2), 213-229.
- Pizzagalli, D.; Lehmann, D. & Brugger, P. (2001). “Lateralized direct and indirect semantic priming effects in subjects with paranormal experiences and beliefs”. Psychopathology34(2), 75-80.
- Pizzagalli, D.; Lehmann, D.; Gianotti, L.; Koenig, T.; Tanaka, H.; Wackermann, J. & Brugger, P. (2000). “Brain electric correlates of strong belief in paranormal phenomena: Intracerebral EEG source and regional Omega complexity analyses”. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging100(3), 139-154.
- Rawcliffe, D. H. (1959). Illusions and delusions of the supernatural and the occult. New York: Dover.
- Riekki, T.; Lindeman, M.; Aleneff, M.; Halme, A. & Nuortimo, A. (2013). “Paranormal and Religious Believers Are More Prone to Illusory Face Perception than Skeptics and Non‐believers”. Applied Cognitive Psychology27(2), 150-155.
- Van Elk, M. (2013). “Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics”. Consciousness and cognition22(3), 1041-1046.
- Van Elk, M. (2013). “Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics”. Consciousness and cognition22(3), 1041-1046.
- van Elk, M. (2015). “Perceptual biases in relation to paranormal and conspiracy beliefs”. PloS one10(6), e0130422.
- van Elk, M. (2017). “The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs”. Consciousness and Cognition49, 313-321.
- Willard, A. K. & Norenzayan, A. (2017). “Spiritual but not religious: Cognition, schizotypy, and conversion in alternative beliefs”. Cognition165, 137-146.
- Williams, L. (2001). “Wings of Illusion: The Origin, Nature and Future of Paranormal Belief [Book Review]”. Australian Journal of Parapsychology1(2), 184.