In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Association of Social Psychology

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 M.Sc. Department of Psychology, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran.

Abstract

.
Aim: Memory conformity occurs when people's memory is affected by each other. It has also been shown that our memory is better for stimuli with emotional valence. People's empathy also affects the extent to which they are affected by emotional stimuli. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the emotional valence of remembered images on memory conformity and the role of empathy in this regard. Method: The statistical population was 400 female university students screened for empathy based on statistical power analysis, and the sample of 60 students were randomly selected from the upper and lower quartiles of empathy scores. The Questionnaire Measure of Emotional Empathy (QMEE) and a recognition memory test using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) was used to collect data. Results: The results of one-way repeated measures ANOVA and Split-Plot (mixed) analysis of variance (SPANOVA) for data analysis showed that memory conformity occurred in images with negative emotional valence less than in other levels of emotional valence (p<0.005). There was no significant difference between participants with high and low empathy in terms of memory conformity in images with different emotional valence. Conclusion: Although there was no difference in the degree of memory conformity between high and low empathy individuals, individuals experience memory conformity at all emotional valences. This conformity is greater in information without emotional capacity.

Keywords

بارون، ر.، بیرن، د.، و برنسکامپ، ن. (1388). روانشناسی اجتماعی. ترجمه یوسف کریمی. تهران: نشر روان.
بشارت، م.، خدابخش، م.،  فراهانی، ح.، و رضازاده، س. (1390). «نقش واسطه­ای خودشیفتگی در رابطه بین همدلی و کیفیت روابط بین شخصی». روان شناسی کاربردی،5 (1 (پیاپی 17)، 7-23.
شهسوارانی، م.؛ رسول­زاده طباطبایی، ک.؛ اللهیاری، ع. ­ع.؛ عشایری، ح. و ستاری، ک (1388). «تأثیر استرس برتوجه بینایی متمرکز و انتخابی با نگاه به عامل شخصیتی دلپذیر بودن». تازه­های علوم شناختی، (1) 61-47.
Abry, A. (2013). Social Anxiety and Memory Conformity in Eyewitnesses. Honors Theses. [Online]. Available: http://scarab.bates.edu/honorstheses/70/.
Allan, K., Midjord, J. P., Martin, D., & Gabbert, F. (2012). Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self versus other. Mem Cognit, 40(2), 280-286. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0141-9
Barlińska, J., Szuster, A., and Winiewski, M. (2018). Cyberbullying among adolescent bystanders: role of affective versus cognitive empathy in increasing prosocial cyberbystander behavior. Front. Psychol. 9:799. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00799
Bartlett, G., Gawrylowicz, J., Frings, D., & Albery, I. P.  (2021). The intoxicated co-witness: effects of alcohol and dyadic discussion on memory conformity and event recall. Psychopharmacology 238, 1485–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05776-0
Bowen, H. J., Kark, S. M., Kensinger, E. A. (2018).  NEVER forget: Negative emotional valence enhances recapitulation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 870–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1313-9
Brown, C., & Schaefer, A. (2010). The effects of conformity on recognition judgments for emotional stimuli. Acta Psychologica, 133, 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.08.004
Carreti_e, L., Mart_ın-Loeches, M., Hinojosa, J. A. & Mercado, F. (2001). Emotion and attention interaction studied through event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 1109–1128.
Carlucci, M. E., Kieckhaefer, J. M., Schwartz, S. L., Villalba, D. K., & Wright, D. B. (2011). The South Beach study: Bystanders' memories are more malleable. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 562–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1720
Citron, F. M., Weekes, B. S., &Ferstl, E. C. (2013). Effects of valence and arousal on written word recognition: Time course and ERP correlates. Neuroscience letters, 533, 90-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.002
Costanzi M., Cianfanelli B., Saraulli D., Lasaponara S., Doricchi F., Cestari V. and Rossi-Arnaud C. (2019). The Effect of Emotional Valence and Arousal on Visuo-Spatial Working Memory: Incidental Emotional Learning and Memory for Object-Location. Front. Psychol. 10:2587. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02587.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. DOI: 10.3758/BF03193146
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 480-485. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193873
Gilet, A. L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., and Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013). Assessing dispositional empathy in adults: a french validation of the interpersonal reactivity index (IRI). Can. J. Behav. Sci. 45, 42–48. doi: 10.1037/a0030425
Hewitt, L. Y., Kane, R., & Garry, M. (2013). Speaking order predicts memory conformity after accounting for exposure to misinformation. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 20(3), 558-565.
Hofelich, A. J., & Preston, S. D. (2012). The meaning in empathy: Distinguishing conceptual encoding from facial mimicry, trait empathy, and attention to emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 26(1), 119–128. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.559192
Hoffman, M. L. (2001). Toward a comprehensive empathy-based theory of prosocial moral development. In A. C. Bohart & D. J. Stipek (Eds.), Constructive & destructive behavior: Implications for family, school, & society (pp. 61–86). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10433-003
Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & Cialdini, R. B. (2014). Social Psychology: Goals in Interaction(6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kesner, L. and Horácek, J. (2017). Empathy-Related Responses to Depicted People in Art Works. Front. Psychol. 8:228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00228.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Macrae, C. N. e Bodenhausen, G. B. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology 51, 93-120.
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.
Mojtahedi, D., Ioannou, M., and Hammond, L. (2017). The Effects of Memory Conformity as a Function of Co-Witness Familiarity. In: Crime, Culture and Social Harm,  John University, UK.
Moret‐Tatay, C., Moreno‐Cid, A., Argimon, I. I. D. L., QuartiIrigaray, T., Szczerbinski, M.,       Murphy, M.,  & Fernández de Córdoba Castellá, P. (2014). The effects of age and emotional valence on recognition memory: An ex‐Gaussian components analysis.Scandinavian journal of psychology, 55(5), 420-426.
Ohman A, Lundqvist D, Esteves F.  (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80:381–396.
Oosterkamp, O. P. (2016). Eyewitnesses and the effect of memory conformity and selfconfidence on eyewitnesses. Retrieved 11 July 2016, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/eyewitness- testimony.htm
Parsons C.E., Young K.S., Jegindø E-ME., Vuust P., Stein A. and Kringelbach M.L. (2014). Music training and empathy positively impact adults’ sensitivity to infant distress. Front. Psychol. 5:1440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01440
Rieffe,Carolien. Ketelaar, Lizet. . (2010). Assessing empathy in young children: Construction and validation of an Empathy Questionnaire (EmQue).Personality and Individual Differences 49 (2010) 362–367.
Roediger, H. L. (2010). Reflections on intersections between cognitive and socialpsychology: A personal exploration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40,189–205.
Schacter, D. L., Guerin, S. A., & St. Jacques,, P. L. (2011). Memory distortion: An adaptiveperspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 467–474.
Schober, S. (2021). The Impact of Social Anxiety on Co-Witness Suggestibility. University of North Dakota. Theses and Dissertations. 3941. https://commons.und.edu/theses/3941
Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855-863.
Skagerberg, E. M., & Wright, D. B. (2008). The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14(6), 513-521.
Stanger, N., Kavussanu, M., & Ring, C. (2012). Put yourself in their boots: Effects of empathy on emotion and aggression. Journal of sport and exercise psychology, 34(2), 208
Tomouka, K., & Kazuo, T. (2014). Co-witness auditory memory conformity following discussion: A misinformation paradigm. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 118(2), 1-15.
Vermeulen, M. C. M., van der Heijden, Kristiaan, B., Benjamins, J. S., Swaab, H., & van Someren, E.us J. (2017). Memory effects of sleep, emotional valence, arousal and novelty in children. J. Sleep Res. 26, 309–317. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12506
Williamson, P., Weber, N., & Robertson, M. T. (2013). The effect of expertise on memory conformity: a test of informational influence. Behavioral sciences & the law, 31(5), 607-623.
Wright, D. B., Busnello, R. H. D., Buratto, L. G., & Stein, L. M. (2012). Are valence and social avoidance associated with the memory conformity effect? Acta psychologica, 141(1), 78-85.
Wright, D.B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E.M., &Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 174-178.