- بابائی امیری، ن.؛ کجباف، م.ب.؛ مظاهری، م.م.؛ منشئی، غ و طالبی، ه (1394). «رابطه راهبردهای شناختی ـ فراشناختی و ویژگی‌های جمعیت شناختی با عملکرد تحصیلی دانشجویان». دانش و پژوهش در روانشناسی کاربردی.16، (2)، 24-33.
- حسینی، ف.س و لطیفیان، م (1388). «پنج عامل بزرگ شخصیت و نیاز به شناخت». فصلنامه روانشناسان ایرانی. 6(21)، 61-68.
- رستگار، ا.؛ قربان جهرمی، ر و مظلومیان، س (1390). «مدل روابط باورهای هوشی، اهداف پیشرفت و درگیری شناختی در دانشآموزان دبیرستانی». تهران، مجله روانشناسی. شماره 57، 90-103.
- زارع، ح و رستگار، ا (1391). «رابطه باورهای معرفت‌شناختی و فرایندهای شناختی: بررسی نقش واسطه‌ای اهداف پیشرفت». فصلنامه روانشناسی. 16(4)، 404- 388.
- زارع، ح و رستگار، ا (1393). «مدل علی پیش‌بینی پیشرفت تحصیلی دانشجویان آموزش مجازی: نقش باورهای هوشی، اهداف پیشرفت و هیجان‌های تحصیلی». دو فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی شناخت اجتماعی. 3(2)، 32-19.
- زارع، ح و رستگار، ا (1394). «بررسی ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی فرم کوتاه پرسشنامه نیاز به شناخت (NCS) در دانش آموزان دبیرستانی». دو فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی شناخت اجتماعی. 3(2)، 32-19.
- قربان جهرمی، ر.؛ حجازی، ا.؛ اژه‌ای، ج و خدایاری فرد، م (1394). «نقش میانجی اهداف پیشرفت در رابطه بین نیاز به شناخت و درگیری شناختی: اثر بافت تعللورزی». مجله روانشناسی. 19(1)، 24-33.
- نیکدل، ف (1389). «بررسی رابطه ادراک از محیط کلاس و باورهای انگیزشی (جهت‌گیری هدف و خودپنداره تحصیلی) با هیجان‌های تحصیلی و یادگیری خودگردان نقش واسطه‌ای هیجان‌های تحصیلی». پایان‌نامه دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه تربیت‌معلم تهران.
- هاشمی، ل (1391). «بررسی رابطه علی کمال‌گرایی و اهمال‌کاری تحصیلی با واسطه‌گری خودتنظیمی انگیزشی و فراشناختی». پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه شیراز.
- Ames, C. (1992). “Classroom Goals, structures, and student motivation”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271.
- Artino, A. R. & Jones II, K. D. (2012). “Exploring the complex relations between achievement emotions and self-regulated learning behaviors in online learning”. Internet and Higher Education.15(3), 170–175.
- Bayata, S. & Meamar, A. (2016). “Predicting Algebra Achievement: Cognitive and Meta-cognitive Aspects”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217(February), 169 – 176.
- Braten, I. & Stromso, H. (2003). “Epistemological belief and implicit theories of intelligence as predictos of achievement goals”. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 29(4), 371-388.
- Broadbent, J. & Poon, W.L. (2015). “Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review”. Internet and Higher Education. 28(October), 1-13.
- Buric, I. & Soric, I. (2012). “The role of test hope and hopelessness in self-regulated learning: Relations between volitional strategies, cognitive appraisals and academic achievement”. Education Journal. 22(4): 221-228.
- Daniels, L. M. & Stupnisky, R. H. (2012). “Not that different in theory: Discussing the control-value theory of emotions in online learning environments”. Internet and Higher Education. 15(3), 222–226.
- Dupeyrat, C. & Marine, C. (2005). “Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults”. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 30(1), 43-59.
- Dweck, C. S. & Leggett, E. L. (1988). “A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality”. Psychological Review. 95(2), 256-273.
- Elliot, A. & Church, M.A. (1997). “A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance motivation”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 72(1), 218-232.
- Elliot, A. & Harachkiewicz, J (1996). “Approach and avoidance achievement goal and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 93(1), 43-54
- Fleischhauer, M.; Enge, S.; Brocke, B.; Ullrich, J. & Strobel, A. (2010). “Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36(1), 82–96.
- Frenzel, A. C.; Goetz, T.; Pekrun, R. & Wartha, S. (2006). “Antecedents and effects of teacher enjoyment and anger”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
- Garn, A. C.; Simonton, K.; Dasingert, T. & Simonton, A. (2017). “Predicting changes in student engagement in university physical education: Application of control-value theory of achievement emotions”. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 29(March), 93-102.
- Goetz, T.; Sticca, F.; Pekrun, R.; Murayama, K. & Elliot, A. J. (2016). “Intraindividual relations between achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: An experience sampling approach”. Learning and Instruction. 41(February), 115-125.
- Haddock, G.; Maio, G. R.; Arnold, K. & Huskinson, T. (2008). “Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 34, 769-778.
- Hornyak, D. A. (2007). “Utilizing cognitive information processing theory to assess the effectiveness of discover on college students’ carrier development. Doctoral dissertation”. University of Pittsburgh.
- Huang, C. (2011). “Achievement goals and achievement emotions: a meta-analysis”. Ducational Psychology Review. 23(3), 359-388.
- Kühl, T.; Eitel, A.; Damnik, G. & Korndle, H. (2014). “The impact of disfluency, pacing, and students’ need for cognition on learning with multimedia”. Computers in Human Behavior. 35(June), 189–198.
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2007). Promoting Post-Secondary Students’ Interest in Science: A Focus on Classroom Influences, Duke Center for Science Education. Amount of award: $5,000. Role on grant: PI.
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. & Barger, M. M. (2014). Achievement goals and emotions. In R. Pekrun, & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.). International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 142e161). New York, NY: Routle
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. & Pekrun, R. (2011). Students' emotions and academic engagement: Introduction to the special issue. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 1–3.
- Luong, C.; Strobel, A.; Wollschläger, R.; Greiff, S.; Vainikainen, M. & Preckel, F. (2017). “Need for cognition in children and adolescents: Behavioral correlates and relations to academic achievement and potential”. Learning and Individual Differences. 53(January), 103–113.
- Meier, E.; Vogl, K. & Preckel, F. (2014). “Motivational characteristics of students in gifted classes: The pivotal role of need for cognition”. Learning and Individual Differences. 33(July), 39-46.
- Middleton, M. J. & Midgley, C. (1997). “Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory”. Journal of Educational Psychology.89(4), 710–718.
- Mouratidis, A.; Vansteenkiste, M.; Lens, W. & Vanden Auweele, Y. (2009). “Beyond positive and negative affect: Achievement goals and discrete emotions in the elementary physical education classroom”. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 10(3), 336–343.
- Pekrun, R. (2006). “The control–value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice”. Educational Psychology Review. 18(4), 315–341.
- Pekrun, R. (2009). Emotions at school. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.). Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 575-604). New York: Routledge.
- Pekrun, R. & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). In International handbook of emotions in education. New York: Routledge.
- Pekrun, R.; Goetz, T. & Frenzel, A. C. (2005). Academic Emotions Questionnaire- Mathematics (AEQ-M) user’s manual. University of Munich: Department of Psychology.
- Pekrun, R.; Goetz, T.; Titz, W. & Perry, R. P. (2002). “Academic emotions in students’self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of quantitative and qualitative research”. Educational Psychologist. 37(2), 91– 106.
- Peng, C. (2012). “Self-Regulated Learning Behavior of College Students of Science and Their Academic Achievement”. Journal of Physics Procedia. 33, 1446-1450.
- Persell, C.H. (2004). “Using Focused Web-based Discussions to Enhance Student Engagement and Deep Understanding”. Teaching Sociology. 32(1), 61-78.
- Pintrich, P. R. & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. Maehr, & P.R. Pintrich, Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes, vol. 7. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Preckel, F.; Götz, T. & Frenzel, A.C. (2010). “Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self-concept and boredom”. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(3), 451–472.
- Rastegar, A.; Ghorban-jahromi, R.; Salim, H. A. & Akbari, A, R. (2010). “The relation of epistemological beliefs and mathematics achievement: the mediating role of achievement goals, matematics self- efficacy, and cognitive engagement”. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 5, 791-797.
- Richardson, J. C. & Newby, T. (2006). “The Role of Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning”. American Journal of Distance Education. 20(1), 23-37.
- Schunk, D. H.; Pintrich, P. R. & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications (3rd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
- Shukora, N. A.; Tasira, Z.; Van der Meijdenb, H. & Haruna, J. (2014). “A Predictive Model to Evaluate Students’ Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116 (February). 4844-4853.
- Simons, J.; Dewitte, S. & lens, W. (2004). “The role of different types of instrumentally in motivation, study strategies, and performance: know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn”. British Journal of Educational psychology. 74(PT3). 343-360.
- Smart, K.L. & Chappel, J. (2006). “Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study”. Journal of Information Technology Education. 5, 201-219.
- Solis, A. (2008). Teaching for Cognitive Engagement: Materializing the Promise of Sheltered Instruction. IDRA Newsletter. School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence.
- Walker, O. C.; Greene, A. B. & Mansell, A. R. (2006). “Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement”. Learning and Individual Differences. 16(1), 1-12.
- Wang, C.H.; Shannon, D. & Ross, M. (2013). “Students' characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning”. Distance Education. 34(3), 302–323.
- Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Zhu, E. (2006). “Interaction and cognitive engagement: An analysis of four asynchronous online discussions”. Instructional Science. 34(6), 451-480.
)