با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن روانشناسی اجتماعی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: شباهت و تفاوت قضاوت های اخلاقی در بین زنان و مردان همیشه محلی برای بحث و گفتگو و بوده است و از آنجایی که اخلاق و حوزه های مربوط به آن به دلیل اهمیت آن در تعاملات اجتماعی و انسانی از روانشناسی جدا نبوده ، و از اهمیت بسزایی نیز برخوردار است ، به همین علت بسیاری از کارهای پژوهشی و تجربی با تمرکز بر روی تفاوت های جنسیتی و اخلاق انجام گرفته است که نتایج متفاوتی نیز در بر داشته و ابهاماتی را در این زمینه ایجاد کرده است . لذا این پژوهش در تشریح این موضوعات می تواند کمک کننده باشد . روش: روش تحلیل و جامعه آماری مطالعه حاضر عبارتست از تمامی مطالعات انجام شده و چاپ شده در رابطه با تفاوت های جنسیت در تصمیم گیری های اخلاقی است که در ده سال اخیر منتشر شده اند . یافته ها: نتایج حکایت از آن دارد که هر چند به نظر می رسد که تفاوت های جنسیتی در واکنش های عاطفی نسبت به ایجاد آسیب در دیگران است اما در مواجهه اخلاقی هم زنان و هم مردان سطوح مشابهی از پردازش خود را در گیر کرده و تفاوت ها در عواملی همچون سن، تحصیلات، آموزش،... از اهمیت بیشتری برخوردارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A meta-analysis on gender differences in ethical decision making

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hossein zare 1
  • azita kharaman 2

1 Professor of Department of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Phd Student of Psychology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The similarities and differences of moral judgements between men and women have always been controversial. Since ethics and its related areas are not separate from psychology, because of its importance in social and human interactions, it is also of great importance. For this reason, much research and empirical works have focused on gender differences and ethics, which has yielded various results and has created ambiguities. Therefore, the results of this research can be helpful in explaining these issues. Method: Regarding the purpose of the study, the method of the meta-analysis in this study includes all studies conducted and published on gender differences in ethical decisions that have been published in the last ten years. Results: The results suggest that although gender differences in emotional responses appear to be detrimental to others, both men and women engage in similar levels of processing in moral confrontation, and differences in factors, such as age, education, studies, and the like are more important.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Moral judgment
  • Ethical decision making
  • Ethical reasoning
  • moral dilemmas
سلامی، ج و مکنون، ر (1396). «فراتحلیل کیفی تحقیقات علمی با موضوع حاکمیت در ایران». فصلنامه پژوهش دولت، 10(33).
شهریاری، ح؛ زارع، ح؛ علی‌اکبری دهکردی، م؛ سرامی فروشانی، غ (1397). «اثربخشی مداخلات شناختی ـ رفتاری در درمان اختلال اضطراب عمومی: یک مطالعه مروری فراتحلیل». مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی رفسنجان،461-478.
مصرآبادی، ج (1395). فراتحلیل: مفاهیم، نرم‌افزار و گزارش دهی. تبریز، 3-52.
Aldrich, D. & Kage, R. (2003). “Mars and venus at twilight: a critical investigation of moralism, age effects, and sex differences”. Polit Psychol 24:23–40.
Amit, E. & Greene, J.D. (2012). “You see, the ends don’t justify the means: Visual imagery and moral judgment”. Psychological Science, 23, 861-868.
Aleman, A. & Swart, M. (2008). “Sex differences in neural activation to facial expressions denoting contempt and disgus”. PLoS One3:e3622.
Bjo¨rklund, F. (2003). “Differences in the justification of choices in moral dilemmas: effects of gender, time pressure and dilemma seriousness”. Scand J Psychol 44:459–466.
Bartels, D.M. (2008). “Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making”. Cognition, 108, 381-417.
Banerjee, K., Huebner, B. & Hauser, M. (2010). “Intuitive moral judgments are robust across variation in gender, education, politics and religion: a large-scale web-based study”. J Cognit Cult 10(3):253–281.
Brody, L.R. & Hall, J.A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions: Part IV: Social/personality issues (2nd ed., pp. 325-414). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Baron-Cohen, S. & Wheelwright, S. (2004). “The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences”. J Autism Dev Disord 34:163–175.
Becker, D.A. & Ulstad, I. (2007). “Gender Differences in Student Ethics: Are Females Really More Ethical? Plagiary: Cross‐Disciplinary Studies in Plagiarism”. Fabrication, and Falsification, 77‐91.
Bebeau, M.J. & Monson, B.E. (2008). Guided by theory, grounded in evidence: a way forward for professional ethics education. In: Nucci LP, Narvaez D (Eds) Handbook of moral and character education. Routledge, New York, pp 557–582.
Carlo, G., Padilla-Walker, L.M. & Nielson, M.G. (2015). “Longitudinal bidirectional relations between adolescents’ sympathy and prosocial behavior”. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1771.
Cahill, L. (2006). “Why sex matters for neuroscience”. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:477–484
Decety, J., Michalska, K.J. & Kinzler, K.D. (2011). “The contribution of emotion and cognition tomoral sensitivity: a neuro developmental study”. Cereb.Cortex 22, 209–220.
Decety, J. & Cowell, J.M. (2015). “Empathy, justice, and moral behavior”. AJOB Neurosci. 6:3±14.
Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. (2002). “Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders”. Psychological Review, 109, 573-598. 
Eisenberg, N. (2005). “The development of empathy-related responding”. Nebr Symp Motiv 51:73–117.
Escobar, M.J., Huepe, D., Decety, J., Sedeno, L., Messow, M.K., Baez, S. & et al. (2014). “Brain signatures of moral sensitivityin adolescents with early social deprivation”. Sci Rep.4:5354.
Fumagalli, M., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Marceglia, S., Mrakic- Sposta, S., Zago, S. & Priori, A. (2010). “Gender-related differences in moral judgments”. Cognitive Processing, 11, 219-226.
Friesdorf, R., Conway, P. & Gawronski, B. (2015). “Gender Differences in Responses to Moral Dilemmas A Process Dissociation Analysis”. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 41(5): 696–713.
Fischer, A.H. & Manstead, A.S.R. (2000). The relation between gender and emotion in different cultures. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 71-96). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greene, J.D., Sommerville, R.B. Nystrom, L.E. Darley, J.M. & Cohen, J.D. (2001). “An Fmri investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment”. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108.
Greene, J.D. & Haidt, J. (2002). “How (and where) does moral judgment work? “.Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 517-523.
Greene, J.D., Morelli, S.A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L.E. & Cohen, J.D. (2008). “Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment”. Cognition, 107, 1144-1154.
Gibbs, J.C. (2013). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg, Hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford University Press.
Gleichgerrcht, E. & Young, L. (2013).” Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment”. PLoS One. 8:e60418.
Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., Mecca, J.T., Medeiros, K.E., Mumford, M.D., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L.D. (2016). “Differences in Biases and Compensatory Strategies across Discipline, Rank, and Gender among University Academics”. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 December; 21(6): 1551–1579.
Hall, J.A. & Schmid Mast, M. (2008). “Are women always more interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of goals and content domain”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 144-155.
Hareli, S., Shomrat, N. & Hess. U. (2009). “Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness”. Emotion 9:378–384.
Jaffee, S.R. & Hyde, J.S. (2000). “Gender difference in moral orientation: a meta-analysis”. Psychol Bull 126(5):703–726.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: the cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. Rand McNally, Chicago, p 134.
Kleinsmith, A., Bianchi-Berthouze, N. & Berthouze, L. (2006). “An effect of gender in the interpretation of affective cues in avatars, in Proceedings Advanced of Workshop on Gender and Interaction”. Conjunction with the International Conference of Visual Interfaces, Venice, Italy.
Kruglanski, A. & Gigerenzer, G. (2011). “Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles”. Psychological Review.  118, 97–109.
Kret, M.E. & de Gelder, B. (2013). “When a smile becomes a fist: the perception of facial and bodily expressions of emotion in violent offenders”. Exp. Brain. Res. 228, 399–410.
Leaper, C. (2015). Gender and social-cognitive development. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 1–47). New Jersey, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Lopez-Saez, M., Morales, J.F. & Lisbona, A. (2008). “Evolution of gender stereotypes in Spain: traits and roles”. Span J Psychol. 11:609±17.
McCabe, A.C., Ingram, R., & Dato-on, M.C. (2006).” The business of ethics and gender”. Journalof Business Ethics, 64, 101-116.
Maeda, Y., Thoma, S.J. & Bebeau, M.J. (2009). “Understanding the relationship between moral judgment development and individual characteristics: the role of educational contexts”. J Educ Psychol 101:233–247.
Meyer, N.D. & Tormala, Z.L. (2010). ““Think” versus “feel” framing effects in persuasion”. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 443-454.
Moore, A.B., Clark, B.A. & Kane, M.J. (2008). “Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment”. Psychol Sci 19: 549–557.
Nichols, S. & Mallon, R. (2006).” Moral dilemmas and moral rules”. Cognition, 100(3), 530–542.
Osman, M. & Wiegmann, A. (2017). “Explaining moral behavior”. Exp Psychol.64, 68–81.
Patterson, R., Rothstein, J. & Barbey, A.K. (2012). “Reasoning, cognitive control, andmoralintuition”. Front. Integr.Neurosci. 6:114.
Patil, I. & Silani, G. (2014). “Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia”. Front Psychol. 5:501.
Paxton, J.M. & Greene, J.D. (2010). ‘Moral reasoning: Hints and allegations”. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 511–527.
Rosen, J.B, Brand, M. & Kalbe, E. (2016). Empathy Mediates the Effects of Age and Sex on Altruistic Moral Decision Making: ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 12 April.
Seyedsayamdost, H. (2015). “On gender and philosophical intuition: failure of replication and other negative results”. Philos Psychol 28(5):642–673.
Strohminger, N., Lewis, R.L. & Meyer, D.E. (2011). “Divergent effects of different positive emotions on moral judgment”. Cognition, 119, 295-300.
Streiner, D.L. (2003). “Meta-Analysis: A 12-Step Program”. J Gambl Stud; 9(1): 1-23.
Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G.L. & Jordan, A.H. (2008). “Disgust as embodied moral judgment”. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 34 (8):1096–109.
Zamzow, J.L. & Nichols, S. (2009).” Variations in ethical intuitions”. Philos Issues 19(1):368–388.
Zibrek, K., Hoyet, L., Ruhland, K. & McDonnell, R. (2015). “Exploring the effect of motion type and emotions on the perception of gender in virtual humans”. Appl. Percept. 12, 1–201.
Zhu, N., Hawk, S.T. & Chang, L. (2018). “Living Slow and Being Moral Life History Predicts the Dual Process of Other-Centered Reasoning and Judgments”. Hum Nat, 29:186–209.
Walker, L.J., Frimer, J.A. & Dunlop, W.L. (2010). “Varieties of moral personality: Beyond the banality of heroism”. Journal of personality, 78(3), 907-942.