شناخت اجتماعی

با همکاری مشترک دانشگاه پیام نور و انجمن روانشناسی اجتماعی ایران

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

رابطه بین صفات شخصیت و فابینگ با توجه به نقش میانجی اعتیاد به اینترنت و دلزدگی تحصیلی در دانشجویان نسل Z

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، گروه روانشناسی، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد قوچان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، واحد بجنورد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، بجنورد، ایران

10.30473/sc.2025.74559.3069

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر، یک مطالعه به روش مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری است که با هدف تعیین میزان برازش مدل ساختاری فابینگ براساس ویژگی‌های شخصیتی با میانجی‌گری اعتیاد به اینترنت و دلزدگی تحصیلی در دانشجویان نسل z انجام گرفت. تعداد 556 نفر با روش نمونه گیری خوشه‌ای از جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل تمامی دانشجویان نسل z (متولدین 1997 الی2012) شاغل به تحصیل در دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحدهای شهر تهران در شش ماه اول سال 1403 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. ابزار گردآوری داده‌‌ها شامل مقیاس عمومی فابینگ چوتبیتایاسونوند و داگلاس (2018)، پرسشنامه‌های اعتیاد به اینترنت کیمبرلی یانگ (1988)، شخصیت کاستا و مک کری (۱۹85) و دلزدگی تحصیلی شارپ و همکاران (2010) بود. نتایج حاصل نشان داد ضریب مسیر مستقیم بین عامل‌‌های وظیفه‌‌شناسی(001/0= P، 236/0-=β) و برونگرایی(015/0= P، 071/0-=β) با فابینگ منفی و ضریب مسیر بین عامل روان رنجورخویی با فابینگ (001/0= P، 138/0=β) مثبت و معنادار است. ضرایب مسیر بین اعتیاد به اینترنت با فابینگ (001/0= P، 363/0=β) از یک سو و دلزدگی تحصیلی با فابینگ(001/0= P، 205/0=β) از سوی دیگر مثبت و معنادار بود. همچنین نتایج نشان داد که هر دو متغیر میانجی اعتیاد به اینترنت و دلزدگی تحصیلی رابطه بین عامل روان رنجورخویی شخصیت با فابینگ را در نسل z به صورت مثبت و رابطه بین دیگر عامل‌های شخصیت با فابینگ را به صورت منفی و معنادار میانجیگری می‌کنند. بنابراین مدل مفروض، مبتنی بر تاثیر ویژگی‌های شخصیتی بر روی فابینگ با توجه به نقش میانجی‌گری متغیرهای اعتیاد به اینترنت و دلزدگی تحصیلی با داده‌های تجربی برازش قابل قبولی داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating the Relationship Between Personality Traits and Phubbing in Generation Z Students: Concerning the Mediating Role of the Internet Addiction and Academic Boredom.

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Ashrafifard 1
  • Mohammad Mohammadipour 2
  • Mahmoud Jajarmi 3

1 Ph.D. Student in Educational Psychology,, Department of Psychology, Boj.C., Islamic Azad University, Bojnord, Iran.

2 Associate Prof, Department of Psychology, Qu.C., Islamic Azad University, Quchan, Iran.

3 Assistant Prof, Department of Psychology, Boj.C., Islamic Azad University, Bojnord, Iran

چکیده [English]

The present study employs structural equation modeling to assess the fit of a structural model encompassing Phubbing based on Personality Traits with the mediating role of Internet Addiction and Academic Boredom in Generation Z Students. A total of 556 people were surveyed using the cluster sampling method from the research's statistical population, including all Generation Z students (born between 1997 and 2012) studying at Islamic Azad University, Tehran branches, during the second semester of the 2023-2024 academic year. The data collection tools included the Chutbitayasonvand and Douglas General Phubbing Scale (2018), Kimberly Young's Internet Addiction Questionnaire (1988), Costa and McCrae's Five-Factor Personality Inventory (1985), and Sharp et al.'s Academic Boredom Questionnaire (2010). The results of the study showed that the direct path coefficient between the factors of conscientiousness (β = -0.236, P = 0.001) and extraversion (β = -0.071, P = 0.015) with negative phubbing and the path coefficient between its neuroticism factor and phubbing (β = 0.138, P = 0.001) was positive and significant. The path coefficient between Internet addiction and phubbing (β=0.363, P=0.001) on the one hand and the path coefficient between academic boredom and phubbing (β=0.205, P=0.001) on the other hand were positive and significant. The results also showed that both mediating variables of Internet addiction and academic boredom positively mediated the relationship between the neuroticism personality factor and phubbing in Generation Z and negatively and significantly mediated the relationship between other personality factors and phubbing. Therefore, the proposed model, based on the effect of personality traits on phubbing, considering the mediating role of variables of Internet addiction and academic boredom, had an acceptable fit with the experimental data.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Academic Boredom
  • Generation Z
  • Internet Addiction
  • Personality Traits
  • Phubbing
مراجع
Abed, M., Kadivar, P., & Khalatbari, J. (2023). Validation of students' academic boredom questionnaire. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal(RRJ), 11(12), 67-74.[http: //frooyesh.ir/article-1-4056-en.html (in persian)
Abi Doumit, C., Malaeb, D., Akel, M., Salameh, P., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2023). Association between Personality Traits and Phubbing: The Co-Moderating Roles of Boredom and Loneliness. Healthcare (Basel), 11(6).[PMC10048773]. https: //doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060915
Afdal, A., Alizamar, A., Ifdil, I., Ardi, Z., Sukmawati, I., Zikra, Z., Ilyas, A., Fikri, M., Syahputra, Y., & Hariyani, H. (2019). An Analysis of Phubbing Behaviour: Preliminary research from counseling perspective Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Sciences and Teacher Profession (ICETeP 2018),   https: //doi.org/10.2991/icetep-18.2019.65.
Agu, S. A., & Aneke, A. B. (2024). Self-Control and Personality Characteristics as Predictors of Social Media Addiction among University Students. 27(3), 58-74.[
Ahmadian, H., & Rostami, C. (2016). Study of tendency of psychology students to addiction based on personality characteristics (neo). SJNMP 2(2).[https: //doi.org/10.29252/sjnmp.2.2.22 (in persian)
Al-Saggaf, Y., MacCulloch, R., & Wiener, K. (2019). Trait Boredom Is a Predictor of Phubbing Frequency. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 4.[https: //doi.org/10.1007/s41347-018-0080-4
Alavi , S. S., Jannatifard, F., Eslami, M., & Rezapour, H. (2011). Survey on validity and reliability of diagnostic questionnaire of internet addiction disorder in students users. Zahedan J Res Med Sci, 13(7), 34-38.[https: //brieflands.com/articles/zjrms-93820 (In Persian)
Alizadeh, Z., Feizi, A., Rejali, M., Afshar, H., Keshteli, A. H., & Adibi, P. (2018). The Predictive Value of Personality Traits for Psychological Problems (Stress, Anxiety and Depression): Results from a Large Population Based Study. J Epidemiol Glob Health, 8(3-4), 124-133.[PMC7377556]. https: //doi.org/10.2991/j.jegh.2017.11.003
Atashrouz, B., Pakdaman, S., & Asgari, A. (2008). The relationship between the big five personality traits and academic achievement. Journal of Developmental Psychology Iranian Psychologists, 16(4), 367-376.[http: //sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1055059 (in persian)
Barbed-Castrejón, N., Navaridas-Nalda, F., Mason, O., & Ortuño-Sierra, J. (2024). Prevalence of phubbing behaviour in school and university students in Spain. Front Psychol, 15, 1396863.[PMC11166009]. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1396863
Capilla Garrido, E., Issa, T., Gutiérrez Esteban, P., & Cubo Delgado, S. (2021). A descriptive literature review of phubbing behaviors. Heliyon, 7(5), e07037.[PMC8144009]. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07037
Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17.[https: //doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.06.020
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory And NEO five factor inventory. Lutz, Florida: Psychological Assessment Resource, Inc. https: //www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Revised-NEO-Personality-Inventory-(NEO-PI-R)-and-Costa-Mccrae/c743ed852f6187bf87e57c7ab336f614d37b2713
Ergün, N., Özkan, Z., & Griffiths, M. D. (2025). Social Media Addiction and Poor Mental Health: Examining the Mediating Roles of Internet Addiction and Phubbing. Psychological Reports, 332941231166609.[PMC36972903]. https: //doi.org/10.1177/00332941231166609
Erzen, E., Odaci, H., & Yeniçeri, İ. (2021). Phubbing: Which Personality Traits Are Prone to Phubbing? Social Science Computer Review, 39(1), 56-69.[https: //doi.org/10.1177/0894439319847415
Fatchurahman, M., Setiawan, M. A., & Karyanti, K. (2023). Intervention group logotherapy and performance measures for reducing phubbing in Generation Z. Estudos de Psicologia, 40.[https: //doi.org/10.1590/1982-0275202340e200244
Fernández-Andújar, M., Alonso, M. O., Sorribes, E., Villalba, V., & Calderon, C. (2022). Internet Addiction, Phubbing, Psychological Variables and Self-Perception of Mathematical Competence in College Students. Mathematics, 10(15), 2631.[https: //www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/15/2631
Gao, B., Liu, Y., Shen, Q., Fu, C., Li, W., & Li, X. (2023). Why Cannot I Stop Phubbing? Boredom Proneness and Phubbing: A Multiple Mediation Model. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 16, 3727-3738.[PMC10497055]. https: //doi.org/10.2147/prbm.S423371
Garcia, M. A., Lerma, M., Perez, M. G., Medina, K. S., Rodriguez-Crespo, A., & Cooper, T. V. (2024). Psychosocial and personality trait associates of phubbing and being phubbed in hispanic emerging adult college students. Current Psychology, 43(6), 5601-5614.[https: //doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04767-y
Ghasemi, v. (2012). Estimation of optimal sample size in structural equation models and evaluation of its adequacy for social researchers. Iranian Journal of Sociology, 12(1), 138-161.[https: //doi.org/20.1001.1.17351901.1390.12.4.5.7 (In Persian)
Gijwani, D., Batra, M., Jindal, A., Vishnupratap, D. R., & Kaur, P. (2024). Assessment of Phubbing, Smart Phone Addiction and Related Psychological Variables among Dental Undergraduates: A Multicentric Study. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 35(1), 13-17.[38934742]. https: //doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_565_23
Guerra Ayala, M. J., Alegre de la Rosa, O. M., Chambi Catacora, M. A. d. P., Vargas Onofre, E., Cari Checa, E., & Díaz Flores, D. (2025). Nomophobia, phubbing, and deficient sleep patterns in college students [Original Research]. Frontiers in Education, Volume 9 - 2024.[https: //doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1421162
Hassan Esfahani, M., Khanjani, M., & Bazram, A. (2021). The factor Structure and psychometric properties of Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP). Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 12(46), 7-26.[https: //doi.org/10.22054/jem.2022.64299.3313 (In Persian)
Holzer, B. M., Ramuz, O., Minder, C. E., & Zimmerli, L. (2022). Motivation and personality factors of Generation Z high school students aspiring to study human medicine. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 31.[https: //doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-03099-4
Hosseinpour, E., Asgari, A., & Ayati, M. (2016). The Relationship between Internet and Cell-Phone Addictions and Academic Burnout in University Students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 24(6), 59-73.[http: //sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/1006393
Hussain, A. (2024). And You Think You Know Gen Z: Real Stories and Practical Tips for Parents, Educators, Marketers, & Employer (1 ed.). Notion Press Media Pvt. Limited. https: //books.google.com/books?id=zgvy0AEACAAJ
Ivanova, A., Gorbaniuk, O., Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., Mraka, N., Polishchuk, V., & Gorbaniuk, J. (2020). Mobile Phone Addiction, Phubbing, and Depression Among Men and Women: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Psychiatr Q, 91(3), 655-668.[PMC7395043]. https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11126-020-09723-8
Jeevan, R., Jiss, J., Ashish, J., & Amal, A. (2025). Boredom Proneness and Big Five Personality Traits Among Emerging Adults. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 13(2), 4098-4104.[https: //doi.org/10.25215/1302.362
Jojo, C. E., & Sundaramoorthy, J. (2022). Personality traits associated with Internet addiction among college students in South India. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2142455.[https: //doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2142455
Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., Çulha, İ., & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of behavioral addictions, 4(2), 60-74.[PMC4500886]. https: //doi.org/10.1556/2006.4.2015.005
Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 351-354.[https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
Khanneh, H., Taimeh, Z., Anas, S., Bawadi, Y., Al-Abcha, T., Qaswal, A. B., & Bani Mustafa, R. (2024). Personality traits & their relation to academic burnout and satisfaction with medicine as a career in Jordanian medical students. Discover Psychology, 4(1), 161.[https: //doi.org/10.1007/s44202-024-00263-x
Kline , R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4 ed.). Guilford press, New York & London.
Kobicheva, A., Tokareva, E., & Baranova, T. (2024). How does students’ level of phubbing relate to academic engagement and performance variables? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40(1), 10.[https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00905-7
Koc, T., & Caliskan, K. (2023). Phubbing phenomenon in educational environments: examining the impact of supervisor phubbing on student outcomes. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 47(1), 15-30.[https: //doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2088270
Lai, X., Hu, C., Ying, L., Xu, H., Zhao, C., Yang, X., Yu, X., & Zhang, G. (2023). Risk and Protective Factors Associated With Smartphone Addiction and Phubbing Behavior Among College Students in China. Psychol Rep, 126(5), 2172-2190.[PMC35412349]. https: //doi.org/10.1177/00332941221084905
Lücke, A. J., Schilling, O. K., Kunzmann, U., Gerstorf, D., Katzorreck-Gierden, M., Hoppmann, C. A., Luong, G., Wagner, G. G., Riediger, M., & Wrzus, C. (2024). Neuroticism, emotional stress reactivity and recovery in daily life: Examining extraversion and openness as moderators. Journal of Research in Personality, 109, 104474.[https: //doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104474
Lv, H., Ye, W., Chen, S., Zhang, H., & Wang, R. (2022). The Effect of Mother Phubbing on Young Children’s Emotional and Behavioral Problems: A Moderated Mediation Model of Mother–Child Attachment and Parenting Stress. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(24), 16911.[PMC9779429]. https: //doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416911
Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W., Wei, M., & Russell, D. (2006). Advances in Testing the Statistical Significance of Mediation Effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(3), 372-378.[https: //doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372
Mason, M. C., Zamparo, G., Marini, A., & Ameen, N. (2022). Glued to your phone? Generation Z's smartphone addiction and online compulsive buying. Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 107404.[https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107404
Medina Gamero, A., & Regalado Chamorro, M. (2021). [Phubbing: The other face of COVID-19]. Semergen, 47(6), 426.[PMC8162816]. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.semerg.2021.05.001 (Phubbing: el otro rostro de la COVID-19.)
Meyers, L. S., Gamest.G, & Goarin, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research, design and interpretation. Sage publication, Thousand oaks. London. New Deihi. https: //study.sagepub.com/meyers3e
MohammadiPour, M., Ashrafifard, S., & Mohammadipour, S. (2023). Relationship Between Metacognitive Beliefs and Body Image Concerns in Primary Dysmenorrhea Intensity: The Mediating Role of Pain Self-Efficacy in Iranian Students [Research Article]. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci, 17(3), e131474.[https: //doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs-131474
Nanda, G., & Prihatsanti, U. (2023). Phubbing in Workplace: The Effect to Employees’ Work Engagement Proceedings of International Conference on Psychological Studies (ICPsyche), 4,, Semarang, Indonesia.  https: //doi.org/10.58959/icpsyche.v4i1.48.
Naz, A., Khan, H. U., Alesawi, S., Abouola, O. I., Daud, A., & Ramzan, M. (2024). AI Knows You: Deep Learning Model for Prediction of Extroversion Personality Trait. IEEE Access, 12, 159152-159175.[https: //doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3486578
Nguyen, T. N. D., Tran, H. Y., Nguyen, G. H. M., Nguyen, Y. K., & Dinh, H. T. M. (2025). Narcissism, Social Media Addiction, Self-Esteem, and Haxeco Traits: Exploring Influences on Life Satisfaction Among Generation Z. Psychol Res Behav Manag, 18, 419-434.[PMC11873018]. https: //doi.org/10.2147/prbm.S447067
Nikel, Ł., Kolańska-Stronka, M., & Krasa, P. (2024). Personality traits, internet addiction, and phubbing among teens: a mediation analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology, 44(3), 463-476.[https: //doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2323096
Nnamani, S. E., Ndu, A., & Obi, T. C. (2025). Personality Traits and Loneliness as Predictors of Internet Addiction among University Undergraduates. Caritas Journal of Psychology and Behaviourial Sciences, 3(1).[
Parus, M., Adu, A., & Keraf, M. (2021). Phubbing Behavior and Quality of Friendship in Faculty of Public Health, Nusa Cendana University. Journal of Health and Behavioral Science, 3, 13-23.[https: //doi.org/10.35508/jhbs.v3i1.3031
Rachman, A., Rusandi, M. A., & Andri Setiawan, M. (2020). Effect of Phubbing Behavior on Student Academic Procrastination. PSIKOPEDAGOGIA Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 8.[https: //doi.org/10.12928/psikopedagogia.v8i1.17895
Rachubińska, K., Cybulska, A., Szkup, M., & Grochans, E. (2021). Analysis of the relationship between personality traits and Internet addiction. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 25(6), 2591-2599.[PMID: 33829445]. https: //doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202103_25422
Rehman, S. u., Rehman, N., & Shehwar, D. (2024). Impact of Social Media on Phubbing Behavior and Incivility: An Empirical Study. Social Sciences Spectrum, 3, 7-16.[https: //doi.org/10.71085/sss.03.04.160
Sadeghi Bimorgh, M., Akbarzadeh, F., Moharreri, F., Akbari, A., Porghafar, H., & Ebrahimi, A. (2023). The relationship between the internet addiction and cell phone addiction with academic burnout in medical students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 25(1), 3-9.[https: //doi.org/10.22038/jfmh.2023.21618
Şahin, S., Demirhan, İ., Arıöz, A., & Ünsal, A. (2024). Assessment Of The Relationship Between Phubbing And Personality Types Among University Students. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 33(1), 115-128.[https: //doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1394592
Sert, H., Üngören, Y., Pelin, M., & Horzum, M. B. (2023). Relationship between chronotypes, personality traits, and phubbing levels in university students. Biological Rhythm Research, 54(3), 322-333.[https: //doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2023.2169653
Sevari, K., & Beshlideh, K. (2010). The relationship between personality characteristics and academic burnout of secondary school students in Ahvaz. Psychological Achievements, 17(1), 89-102.[https: //psychac.scu.ac.ir/article_11673_5c9a0888be37d37b04d589b1916a89ba.pdf
Sharp, J. G., Zhu, X., Matos, M., & Sharp, J. C. (2021). The Academic Boredom Survey Instrument (ABSI): a measure of trait, state and other characteristic attributes for the exploratory study of student engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(9), 1253-1280.[https: //doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1947998
Sulea, C., van Beek, I., Sarbescu, P., Virga, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Engagement, boredom, and burnout among students: Basic need satisfaction matters more than personality traits. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 132-138.[https: //doi.org/https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.018
Thomas, T. T., Carnelley, K. B., & Hart, C. M. (2022). Phubbing in romantic relationships and retaliation: A daily diary study. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107398.[https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107398
Tian, Y., Zhao, Y., Lv, F., Qin, N., & Chen, P. (2021). Associations Among the Big Five Personality Traits, Maladaptive Cognitions, and Internet Addiction Across Three Time Measurements in 3 Months During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol, 12, 654825.[PMC8172586]. https: //doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654825
Toyama, M., & Hayashi, Y. (2022). Links of personality traits to media multitasking: Conscientiousness predicts mobile phone use in the college classroom. Current Psychology, 41(12), 8660-8667.[https: //doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01258-2
Treviño Benavides, T. B., Alcorta Castro, A. T., Garza Marichalar, S. A., Peña Cisneros, M., & Baker Suárez, E. C. (2023). Understanding Generation Z and Social Media Addiction. SpringerBriefs in Business, in: Social Media Addiction in Generation Z Consumers. https: //link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-33452-8
Vanden Abeele, M. M. P., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562-569.[https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
Wahyuni, S., Agustina, H., & Munthe, R. A. (2023). The Relationship between Personality and Academic Burnout: Exploring the Influence of Psychological Well-Being and Demographic Factors. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 4(2), 169-189.[https: //doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v4i2.18687
Weston, R., & Gore, P. (2006). A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719-751.[https: //doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
Wu, X., Zhang, W., Li, Y., Zheng, L., Liu, J., Jiang, Y., & Peng, Y. (2024). The influence of big five personality traits on anxiety: The chain mediating effect of general self-efficacy and academic burnout. PLoS One, 19(1), e0295118.[https: //doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295118
Yusoff, M. S. B., Hadie, S. N. H., & Yasin, M. A. M. (2021). The roles of emotional intelligence, neuroticism, and academic stress on the relationship between psychological distress and burnout in medical students. BMC Med Educ, 21(1), 293.[PMC8140426]. https: //doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02733-5
شناخت اجتماعی
دوره 13، شماره 26 - شماره پیاپی 26
آذر 1403
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار